We have evaluated Penpot (self-hosted) and compared its features and user experience with Figma. Figma has been used in our organization for several years.
Penpot isn’t quite there yet in terms of functionality and performance for us to consider switching to the tool within the next few years. However, we still see value in keeping it as a “backup.”
Performance
-
Files render very slowly.
-
When zooming in and out on the canvas, only placeholder images are displayed, even when there are only a few components on the page.
-
When multiple people work in the same file simultaneously, updates are not reflected in real time. For example, if one person edits a sticky note, the change isn’t visible until they’ve “left” the note, which makes collaboration more difficult.
Functionality
-
Lacks features available in Figma, such as certain types of variable handling in components.
-
No native whiteboard tool.
-
Is it possible to install fonts in a container image for Penpot so that all users have access to them?
-
Are there any plans to run Penpot locally on your own computer?
Conclusion
There are, of course, positive aspects as well—for example, Penpot has much better handling of design tokens than Figma.
We will continue testing Penpot; it’s always interesting to explore and try other design tools. We are especially looking forward to the new rendering engine—if they solve the performance issues, the overall experience of working in the tool will improve significantly.
